Christianity is simultaneously traditional and progressive.
- Traditional in that it doesn't allow you to change your values to suit your convenience, and that it is based on a history going back to the Jewish people as chosen by God.
- Progressive in that it is urging to always press onwards and to not blindly accept following rules.
Western culture used to be generally traditional: looking into the past for significance. About 500 years ago, it started looking for significance in a future that we create (Renaissance, Scientific Revolution, etc).
However, our culture is now in a transition period where people are second-guessing tradition and second-guessing our ability to create a positive future.
What does it mean for us?
- Being traditional is useful to not deceive ourselves, unknowingly blinded by our limited perspective.
- Being progressive is liberating when change is needed.
Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about.
A tradition without intelligence is not worth having.
If technical progress is not matched by corresponding progress in man's ethical formation, in man's inner growth, then it is not progress at all, but a threat for man and for the world.
- Specifically, what are some examples when we were traditional when we should be progressive and vice versa?
- (Broader question) What kinds of situations call for being traditional or progressive?
Comments
Comment on References
I wish there was one good, short video or other resource I could tell you all to watch, but I can't find one. Maybe it is because I wanted to look at Traditionalism and Progressivism as broad worldviews.